Salesforce Business Analyst Certification Practice Exam

During a sprint grooming session, where should the "Code Review by technical architect" step be moved?

1. Project plan

2. Definition of Done

3. Pull request template

4. Team retrospective notes

The correct answer is: Project plan

The "Code Review by technical architect" step aligns best with the Definition of Done. This concept encompasses the specific criteria that must be met for a user story or piece of work to be considered complete. Including code review as part of the Definition of Done emphasizes the importance of code quality and validation before the work can be marked as finished. By integrating the code review process into the Definition of Done, the team establishes a shared understanding that completing a task involves not only development but also ensuring that code has been reviewed for design, functionality, and adherence to standards. This approach fosters accountability and ensures that quality assurance is ingrained in the development process rather than being an afterthought or a separate task that can be overlooked. In contrast, placing the code review in other options might not capture its integral role in ensuring the quality and readiness of work before it is deemed complete. For example, it doesn't fit well into a project plan as it represents a step within the process rather than an overarching schedule or timeline. Similarly, it's not typically documented in a pull request template, which is more about the submission process and not about defining completion criteria. Lastly, while team retrospective notes can capture improvement actions and reflections, they are not a proactive measure for defining done-ness